Traveling Home: losing the Montana dream
Wednesday, June 27th, 2007A few months ago my mother said the most depressing thing to me I’ve ever heard: “You can’t buy the Montana you grew up in. Not for any millions of dollars. It doesn’t exist anymore.” It was even more depressing to acknowledge how right she was. For her, who grew up a fourth-generation Montanan on the old family ranch homestead, the realization has been an even greater blow, but it was bad enough for me, who was raised to love the mountains and trees as if they were my siblings. The old family homestead, a 2400-acre ranch where my grandfather’s cousin still raises cattle, just south of the mountains pictured above, is now a relic of a frontier past that can no longer be found anywhere on the planet.
Like many places in the American West, Montana has seen an explosion of vacation home and resort development over the past few years. I just returned home from a trip to my native stomping grounds, and am still reeling, slightly ill from the sight of 10,000-square-foot log vacation homes carving up mountainsides I used to walk with only friends and birds. A few months ago I heard about the Yellowstone Club, an exclusive billionaires’ gated community complete with private golf course and ski mountain, where the most expensive house in the world was being built. This not 20 miles from the tiny, dumpy wheat-ranch-dependent town where I grew up and my parents’ house sold in 1988 for less than twenty thousand dollars.
I’ve written elsewhere about the tremendous personal loss I feel at the overthrow of wilderness and open spaces in favor of the vacation home market. But it’s about more than just the loss of intangible values wild places give us: the ease of travel for a generation with good retirement incomes has opened up any community with a bit of beauty and resort potential to the rapaciousness of consumerism and the almighty pocketbook. Montana might be the place closest to my heart, but it’s by no means the only one affected. I have recently talked to friends whose families have lived on Cape Cod since the Mayflower (no, really), who are now being pushed out by rising property prices driven by the same vacation homeowners — people who can afford to winter in Florida or Phoenix and summer wherever they please. I recently heard a news report about a town on the Connecticut shore whose schools and volunteer fire departments are closing because all housing has been bought up by wealthy weekending New Yorkers, and people who just want to live in a good community are priced out of the market.
And it’s not just the U.S. There are islands and towns in the U.K. that have been losing population, and community structure, for the very same reasons. Travel and income have opened up Provence, Spain, and southern Portugal to people looking for a way to invest, buy a retirement home, or dress themselves in the cache that comes of owning vacation property.
The travel and travel writing communities have been talking more loudly in recent years about travel’s impact on both the environment and on local communities — effects that can be both tremendously detrimental and tremendously beneficial. But not many of us are aware of the effect of easy travel on our own communities, our own backyards.
Look at that picture of my ancestors’ homestead. 2400 acres, you’d think, not bad. Driving there involves hundreds of miles through seemingly empty farm- and prairieland. You’d never guess that just five miles away, a huge tract of state forest was sold to a developer, who sold the timber and built mega-McMansion vacation homes on it for wealthy Californians who come to hunt bear and wolves maybe two weeks a year. The wildlife required for their recreation are often “problem” animals tranquilized and lifted from Yellowstone National Park. “Money talks,” said my 80-something-year-old cousin. “They come to hunt twice a year, all those rich people, and in the meantime I’ve lost 14 head of cattle to the wolves and bears. That’s a thousand bucks per head, but nobody’s compensating me.” Against the pleasure-pressure of those with money, how long will he be able to keep his ranch running? At what point will vacation destinations no longer be able to support the communities that made them so attractive in the first place?




